免费精品视频一区二区三区学生,被3个黑人老外玩的4p,人妻精品无码中文无码一区无,添女人荫蒂全部过

首頁> 美國政府科技報告 >National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies. How Effective Are Different Welfare-to-Work Approaches. Five-Year Adult and Child Impacts for Eleven Programs.
【24h】

National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies. How Effective Are Different Welfare-to-Work Approaches. Five-Year Adult and Child Impacts for Eleven Programs.

機譯:國家對福利工作戰(zhàn)略的評估。不同的福利工作方法的有效性。對十一個項目的五年成人和兒童影響。

獲取原文

摘要

For the past 30 years, federal and state policymakers have been legislating various types of programs to increase employment among welfare recipients. How people can best move from welfare to work, however, has been the subject of long-standing debate. This report, summarizing the long-term effects of 11 mandatory welfare-to-work programs on welfare recipients and their children, represents a major advance in resolving this debate. The findings are the final ones from the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies (NEWWS), a multi-year study of alternative approaches to helping welfare recipients find jobs, advance in employment and leave public assistance. 'What works best, and for whom' is the central question animating this report and the NEWWS Evaluation as a whole. In particular, the evaluation compares the effects of two alternative pre-employment strategies, for different groups of welfare recipients: programs that emphasize short-term job search assistance and encourage people to find employment quickly (referred to as 'Labor Force Attachment' (LFA) or, more broadly, 'employment-focused' programs); and programs that emphasize longer-term skill-building activities, primarily basic education (referred to as 'Human Capital Development' (HCD) or, more broadly, 'education-focused' programs). The effects of each approach are estimated from a wealth of data pertaining to over 40,000 single parents (mostly mothers) and their children, and a five-year follow-up period (falling somewhere between 1991 and 1999, depending on the site), using an innovative and rigorous research design based on the random assignment of individuals to one or more program groups (with services) or to a control group (without services).

著錄項

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網安備:11010802029741號 ICP備案號:京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服務號

主站蜘蛛池模板: 大城县| 阳东县| 唐河县| 连平县| 澳门| 吉安市| 磐石市| 保德县| 旬邑县| 涞水县| 平远县| 临安市| 河津市| 永吉县| 兴业县| 清镇市| 台山市| 河南省| 鄱阳县| 成都市| 福泉市| 巴马| 南投市| 莒南县| 拜泉县| 宜宾县| 扶绥县| 铜山县| 黄平县| 河北省| 萨嘎县| 盱眙县| 五大连池市| 济阳县| 木兰县| 永和县| 漯河市| 灵璧县| 甘谷县| 庐江县| 珠海市|